Assessing Digital Technology Integration in Islamic Religious Education: A CIPP Model Evaluation

Authors

  • Shofia Fadila Nur Husna Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
  • Rasya Raesita Prasanti Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
  • Nisa Amaliah Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
  • Fitri Nur Husniyah Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
  • Naufal Qameer International Islamic University Islamabad

Keywords:

Digital Technology Integration, Islamic Religious Education, CIPP Model, Digital Learning, Educational Evaluation

Abstract

The rapid expansion of digital technology has transformed contemporary educational practices, including the teaching of Islamic Religious Education (IRE). However, the extent to which digital technology is effectively integrated into IRE learning environments remains insufficiently evaluated, particularly in terms of program readiness, implementation processes, and learning outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the integration of digital technology in Islamic Religious Education using the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) evaluation model at SMP Muhammadiyah Al-Kautsar PK Kartasura. This research employed a qualitative evaluative design. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with Islamic Religious Education teachers and were analyzed using qualitative data analysis techniques involving data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The credibility of the findings was ensured through source triangulation and systematic validation procedures. The findings reveal that digital technology integration is supported by a strong institutional commitment to developing a digital learning environment, accompanied by adequate technological infrastructure such as e-modules, multimedia resources, learning management systems, and computer-based assessments. These digital tools facilitate more interactive and flexible learning processes, enhance students’ engagement, and support the development of digital literacy within the context of Islamic learning. Nevertheless, the evaluation also indicates that the assessment of students’ religious character development within digitally mediated learning environments still requires more systematic measurement. The study implies that effective digital integration in Islamic Religious Education requires not only technological facilities but also pedagogical readiness and institutional support to ensure that digital learning contributes to both cognitive understanding and the internalization of Islamic values.

References

[1] J.-H. Jang, Y. Noh, and J.-S. Kim, “Validation of a Digital Human-Based Safety Education Framework for Migrant Construction Workers in Korea Using the CIPP Model and a Modified Delphi Study,” Sustain., vol. 17, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.3390/su17010169.

[2] L. Kang and X. Xu, “Progress and prospect of digital transformation of higher education in China: Bibliometric and visualized analysis,” J. Adult Contin. Educ., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 109–134, 2025, doi: 10.1177/14779714241300086.

[3] P. Ninghardjanti, W. Murtini, A. Hindrayani, and K. B. Sangka, “Evaluation of the Smart Indonesia Program as a Policy to Improve Equality in Education,” Sustain., vol. 15, no. 6, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15065114.

[4] B. Aybek and O. Oğuz, “Sustainable and Inclusive Education Reform in Türkiye: A Cipp Evaluation of the Primary Turkish Language Curriculum †,” Sustain., vol. 17, no. 19, 2025, doi: 10.3390/su17198659.

[5] A. Suryanto, L. Yuliana, N. A. Purwanto, F. M. Firdaus, and R. Fadhli, “Context input process product evaluation of hybrid learning practices in Indonesian universities,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ. , vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 475–487, 2024, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v13i1.26588.

[6] P. Santoso, E. Sari, and N. Karnati, “Evaluation of the Indonesian Languange Training Program at the Defence Languange Training Centre,” J. Ecohumanism, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 956–980, 2024, doi: 10.62754/joe.v3i3.3398.

[7] J. Simorangkir, M. L. Nababan, W. Agustina, M. R. Simamora, A. Sinamo, and J. W. Hasugian, “Evaluating the Accreditation Results of Christian Colleges in Indonesia Using the Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) Model,” Int. J. Learn. Teach. Educ. Res., vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 243–261, 2022, doi: 10.26803/ijlter.21.11.14.

[8] L. E. Riyanti and W. Gauthama, “Beyond replication: systemic challenges in adapting international standards for vocational higher education,” J. Appl. Res. High. Educ., pp. 1–16, 2025, doi: 10.1108/JARHE-06-2025-0428.

[9] A. Sri Mardiyanti Syam, “BRIDGING POLICY AND PRACTICE: EVALUATING THE CURRICULUM EFFECTIVENESS IN FOSTERING RELIGIOUS MODERATION AND 21ST-CENTURY COMPETENCIES,” J. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 403–414, 2025, doi: 10.15575/jpi.v11i2.49596.

[10] N. L. Sustiawati, I. G. O. S. Negara, R. Sumarno, and A. S. Nalan, “Evaluation of the Management of Performing Arts Creation Learning,” Harmon. J. Arts Res. Educ., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 195–207, 2023, doi: 10.15294/harmonia.v23i1.43486.

[11] A. Kadir, “Evaluation of the Application of Distance Learning Programs in Madrasah Aliyah Malang Regency,” J. Pendidik. Agama Islam, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 109–124, 2021, doi: 10.14421/jpai.2021.181-06.

[12] N. Huda, D. Dahliana, and A. F. Aseri, “Improving The Quality of Prophetic Intelligence-Based Moral Education Programs with the CIPP Model,” Eurasian J. Educ. Res., vol. 2023, no. 107, pp. 1–16, 2023, doi: 10.14689/ejer.2023.107.001.

[13] Y. Mof, W. Ramadan, and H. Mizani, “Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Santripreneur Program in Islamic Boarding School: A CIPP-Based Qualitative Assessment of Screenprinting Training,” Munaddhomah, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 141–156, 2026, doi: 10.31538/munaddhomah.v6i4.2435.

[14] M. Muhsin, A. Kususiyanah, and M. Maksum, “Religious Moderation in Indonesian Islamic Universities: Policy Implementation and Identity Formation at IAIN Ponorogo,” Ascarya J. Islam. Sci. Cult. Soc. Stud., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 54–66, 2024, doi: 10.53754/iscs.v4i2.713.

[15] M. Yunus Abu Bakar, E. Firmansyah, and M. B. Abdeljelil, “Legal Framework Analysis of Islamic Religious Education Policy Implementation,” Int. J. Law Soc., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 217–237, 2024, doi: 10.59683/ijls.v3i3.143.

[16] S. Susilawati et al., “Educational Technology-Based Strategies for The Internationalization of Islamic Higher Education in Indonesia and Brunei Darussalam,” Nazhruna J. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 414–431, 2025, doi: 10.31538/nzh.v8i2.63.

[17] u. Akmaliyah, Y. Hudzaifah, N. Ulfah, and M. I. Pamungkas, “Child-friendly teaching approach for arabic language in nn indonesian islamic boarding school,” Int. J. Lang. Educ., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 501–514, 2021, doi: 10.26858/IJOLE.V5I1.15297.

[18] M. Brandl and M. Vinerean, “Narrative Didactics in Mathematics Education: Results from a University Geometry Course,” Open Educ. Stud., vol. 5, no. 1, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1515/edu-2022-0186.

[19] T. Budiharso, I. Makruf, and I. Mujahid, “Porter’s Five Forces: Evaluating Education Management Practices for the Postgraduate Program of UIN RM Said Surakarta, Indonesia,” J. Soc. Stud. Educ. Res., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 164–192, 2022.

[20] V. Marín, B. E. Sampedro Requena, J. M. Muñoz-González, and E. M. Vega, “Primary Education and Augmented Reality. Other Form to Learn,” Cogent Educ., vol. 9, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2022.2082082.

[21] A. N. Andri Nirwana et al., “SWOT Analysis of AI Integration in Islamic Education: Cognitive, Affective, and Psychomotor Impacts,” Qubahan Acad. J., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 476–503, 2025, doi: 10.48161/qaj.v5n1a1498.

[22] A. Zhu, “A CIPP-Model Based Course Evaluation System for Landscape Engineering Construction Technology in Higher Vocational Colleges: Integration of Random Forest Algorithm and AHP,” in Proceedings of 2025 2nd International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence for Education, ISAIE 2025, School of Municipal and Ecological Engineering, Shanghai Urban Construction Vocational College, Shanghai, China: Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, 2025, pp. 1067–1073. doi: 10.1145/3775073.3775241.

[23] N. Yoshany, S. S. M. Mahmoodabad, L. Moradi, and M. Sharma, “Beyond traditional training: a comprehensive CIPP evaluation of medical internships: assessing program design, implementation, and clinical competency outcomes,” BMC Med. Educ., vol. 25, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07404-3.

[24] Y. Zhao et al., “Development of a blended teaching quality evaluation scale (BTQES) for undergraduate nursing based on the Context, Input, Process and Product (CIPP) evaluation model: A cross-sectional survey,” Nurse Educ. Pract., vol. 77, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2024.103976.

[25] Ö. Yalçın Çer, “Evaluating the Turkish Classroom-Teaching Undergraduate Program: A CIPP Model Approach,” SAGE Open, vol. 16, no. 1, 2026, doi: 10.1177/21582440261416973.

[26] O. V Afanasenko, I. V Nizhenkovska, O. I. Holovchenko, and O. O. Glushachenko, “Technology-enhanced constructivist learning environment for pharmacy students,” Pharm. Educ., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 778–787, 2022, doi: 10.46542/PE.2022.221.778787.

[27] P. Koebe, “How digital technologies and AI contribute to achieving the health-related SDGs,” Int. J. Inf. Manag. Data Insights, vol. 5, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.jjimei.2024.100298.

[28] Y. Affandi, A. Darmuki, and A. Hariyadi, “The Evaluation of JIDI (Jigsaw Discovery) Learning Model in the Course of Qur an Tafsir,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 799–820, 2022, doi: 10.29333/iji.2022.15146a.

[29] M. Mukhibat, M. Effendi, W. H. Setyawan, and M. Sutoyo, “Development and evaluation of religious moderation education curriculum at higher education in Indonesia,” Cogent Educ., vol. 11, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2024.2302308.

[30] S. Haga, “From knowledge to inclusion: Culturally responsive TPACK (TPACCK),” Res. Pract. Technol. Enhanc. Learn., vol. 20, 2025, doi: 10.58459/rptel.2025.20003.

[31] A.-L. Max, S. Lukas, and H. Weitzel, “The relationship between self-assessment and performance in learning TPACK: Are self-assessments a good way to support preservice teachers’ learning?,” J. Comput. Assist. Learn., vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 1160–1172, 2022, doi: 10.1111/jcal.12674.

[32] H. Sancar-Tokmak, H. Surmeli, and S. Ozgelen, “Preservice science teachers’ perceptions of their TPACK development after creating digital stories,” Int. J. Environ. Sci. Educ., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 247–264, 2014, doi: 10.12973/ijese.2014.214a.

[33] T. Schubatzky, J.-P. Burde, R. Große-Heilmann, C. Haagen-Schützenhöfer, J. Riese, and D. Weiler, “Predicting the development of digital media PCK/TPACK: The role of PCK, motivation to use digital media, interest in and previous experience with digital media,” Comput. Educ., vol. 206, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104900.

[34] M. B. Freeh and M. S. Hussein, “The Level of Teaching Performance of Islamic Education Teachers in The Intermediate Stage in The State of Iraq in The Light of Quality Assurance Standards from The Point of View of Teachers (The Assistant Teacher),” Rev. Int. Geogr. Educ. Online, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 3985–3997, 2021, doi: 10.48047/rigeo.11.05.280.

[35] N. A. A. M. Alselwii and R. A. Rahman, “The Islamic Education Approach to Evaluating the Behavior of Societal Elites,” Glob. J. Al-Thaqafah, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 284–300, 2024, doi: 10.7187/GJAT122024-18.

[36] Z. Che, J. Yang, L. Wu, and D. Wu, “Promoting Teachers’ Digital Literacy Achievement: A Nationwide Survey of Education Informatization in China,” in 31st International Conference on Computers in Education, ICCE 2023 - Proceedings, S. J.-L., K. A., C. W., C. W., O. H., B. R., C. B., D. S., M. J., Y. A.M.F., Y. Y., and Z. H., Eds., Faculty of Artificial Intelligence in Education, Central China Normal University, China: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education, 2023, pp. 997–1002.

[37] M. Sahle and A. Melaku, “Digital and emerging technologies to evaluate and restore socio-ecological production landscapes and seascapes: a systematic review,” Geoj. , vol. 90, no. 6, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10708-025-11544-w.

[38] I. del Arco, Ò. Flores-Alarcia, J. Balladares, and G. Quintero, “Assessing digital competencies: A self-evaluation approach for university students’ academic success,” J. Educ. e-Learning Res., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 439–448, 2025, doi: 10.20448/jeelr.v12i3.7322.

[39] M. A. Al Asmri, J. Ennis, R. J. Stone, F. Bello, M. S. Haque, and J. Parle, “Effectiveness of technology-enhanced simulation in teaching digital rectal examination: A systematic review narrative synthesis,” BMJ Simul. Technol. Enhanc. Learn., vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 414–421, 2021, doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000587.

[40] D. Pandita and V. V. R. Kumar, “Online teaching and its impact on self-monitoring of faculty members: learnings for the future from a pandemic,” High. Educ. Ski. Work. Learn., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 682–696, 2023, doi: 10.1108/HESWBL-03-2022-0059.

[41] G. Wang and J. He, “A Bibliometric Analysis on Research Trends of Digital Literacy in Higher Education from 2012 to 2021,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., vol. 17, no. 16, pp. 43–58, 2022, doi: 10.3991/ijet.v17i16.31377.

[42] R. Makhachashvili and I. Semenist, “Progress of Digital Learning Individual Quality Assessment In Oriental and European Languages University Programs through the Pandemic,” in Proceedings - 2022 4th International Conference on Computer Science and Technologies in Education, CSTE 2022, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University, Romance Languages and Typology, Kyiv, Ukraine: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2022, pp. 133–138. doi: 10.1109/CSTE55932.2022.00031.

[43] M. Kireš, A. Juhásová, Š. Karolčik, and V. Hubeňáková, “Learning Environment in the Digital Age for Personalised STEM Education,” in ICETA 2024 - 22nd Year of International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications, Proceedings, F. S., Ed., P. J. Šafárik University in Košice, Faculty of Science, Institute of Physics, Košice, Slovakia: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2024, pp. 332–337. doi: 10.1109/ICETA63795.2024.10850782.

[44] Y. Peng and Z. Tan, “Online Sharing Mechanism of Digital Teaching Resources Considering Knowledge Potential Difference,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 243–258, 2023, doi: 10.3991/ijet.v18i09.40231.

[45] N. Suprapto et al., “Research trend on TPACK through bibliometric analysis (2015-2019),” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1375–1385, 2021, doi: 10.11591/IJERE.V10I4.22062.

[46] Y. Li, N. A. B. Anuar, A. Z. B. Mansor, and J. Xing, “Predicting Digital Literacy in Higher Education: The Role of Personal Factors,” Eurasian J. Educ. Res., vol. 2024, no. 114, pp. 156–178, 2024, doi: 10.14689/ejer.2024.114.10.

[47] S.-C. Tang and L.-C. Tang, “Exploring the impact of digital concept mapping methods on nurse students’ learning anxiety, learning motivation,” Eval. Program Plann., vol. 106, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102466.

[48] Y.-F. Yang and C.-C. Fan, “Evaluating the effectiveness of Virtual Reality (VR) technology in safety management and educational training: an empirical study on the application and feasibility of digital training systems,” Interact. Learn. Environ., vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 3804–3832, 2025, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2025.2454434.

[49] D. Calderón-Garrido, R. Gil-Fernández, and C. Martín-Piñol, “Exploring Perspectives, Uses, Implications and Needs of the Educational Digital Portfolio in the Arts: A Systematic Review of the Scientific Literature,” SAGE Open, vol. 13, no. 3, 2023, doi: 10.1177/21582440231185557.

[50] A. Salim, I. Narongraksakhet, A. Hayani, M. A. Putri, A. Hassama, and A. A. Abdullah, “Outcome-Based Education, E-Learning, and Student Satisfaction: Evidence from Indonesia and Thailand,” J. Ilm. Peuradeun, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 531–550, 2026, doi: 10.26811/peuradeun.v14i1.1285.

[51] A. Moriña and V. H. Perera, “Promoting inclusive practices with emerging technologies in higher education: Faculty professional development through blended-learning,” Internet High. Educ., vol. 67, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.101019.

[52] S. Wang, L. Fan, and Y. Liu, “A Study on the Influence of Blended Learning on Oral Learning Motivation of Non-English Majors,” in Proceedings - 2021 International Conference on Internet, Education and Information Technology, IEIT 2021, Gannan University of Science and Technology, Department of Human Sciences, Ganzhou, China: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2021, pp. 396–399. doi: 10.1109/IEIT53597.2021.00094.

[53] P. Yonchai, P. Worakham, and P. Panya, “The Development of the Blended Learning Model Using Rotating Stations (BLRS) in the Case of a Small Elementary School,” Eurasian J. Educ. Res., vol. 2023, no. 103, pp. 33–61, 2023, doi: 10.14689/ejer.2023.103.003.

[54] M. F. Alquraan, S. Alazzam, and D. Farhat, “Assessing the structural relationships between the CIPP model components in teacher education program,” Asian Educ. Dev. Stud., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 103–114, 2025, doi: 10.1108/AEDS-09-2024-0217.

[55] H. F. Khan, S. Qayyum, H. Beenish, R. A. Khan, S. Iltaf, and L. R. Faysal, “Determining the alignment of assessment items with curriculum goals through document analysis by addressing identified item flaws,” BMC Med. Educ., vol. 25, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06736-4.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-07

How to Cite

Husna, S. F. N., Prasanti, R. R., Amaliah, N., Husniyah, F. N., & Qameer, N. (2026). Assessing Digital Technology Integration in Islamic Religious Education: A CIPP Model Evaluation. Islamic Pedagogy Evaluation Journal, 1(1), 17–32. Retrieved from https://ipej.nresh.com/ipej/article/view/1

Issue

Section

Articles